The Complexity Of Nonuniform Random Number Generation Pdf To Word

The suggestion for GUIDs is a good one. GUIDs are quite long, though.If you want a random number that is smaller, you need to suggest about how many digits you want.Generation of random numbers is not trivial, and most algorithms you will find are complete rubbish. Ideally you should have a random number generator with a uniform distribution. These tend to be few and far between.If this is what you want, I'd suggest an M-sequence generator because they are extremely well understood and have a very nice uniform distribution. (They are also highly predictable, meaning that by knowledge of the current number and the algorithm you can easily get the number number - something common to all random number generators. However by taking a small sequence of the numbers generated you can reconstruct the generating function. This is not a big deal in many applications but is something to be aware of.).

Cellular Automaton

If you fire up a CMD prompt, you can type. Echo%random% clip.to get a random number between 0 and 32767 into the clipboard.If you need a longer number, in PowerShell, you can type. Get-Random -Minimum 9999 -Maximum 99999999 clip.to get a random number between any numbers you choose, into the clipboard.I have not looked at this closely, but, you should be able to make a PowerShell script that will input the random number into Word automatically.But, it's probably best to do it with a, but I don't know much about that.